BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Richard Webb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:04:56 000
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>

HI Harvey,

Got that tape from you in the mail the other day.  Thanks a
bunch.
On 2006-03-30 [log in to unmask] said:
   >And I think if anyone takes a look at the sorry state of
   >broadcasting today, they will know that the FCC cares nothing about
   >radio in any capacity.
OF course not, follow the money.  IT's not in most radio
services unless you're talking satellite and terrestrial
microwave subscriber services such as cellular pcs and the
like.  GOtta think about your gig after your political
appointment goes bye bye.  You too if you're a former
regulator can move through the revolving door to a position
at one of these companies making the real money if you just
play ball and toe the company line while you're regulating
them.

HEy who's interested in broadcasting?  Terrestrial
broadcasting is money intensive for overhead.  WHo cares
about that?  TWO-way services other than public safety?  AS
long as they don't encroach on the big money players let 'em
have their free-for-all.  Who cares about the public
convenience or necessity?  GO with the money!!!

Hey the revolving door worked great for BIlly Tauzin.  From
his position as a lawmaker he was in a prime position to get
a big offer from the cellular companies if big pharma didn't
grab him first.

73 de nf5b



Richard WEbb,
Electric SPider Productions,
Eads Tennessee



ATOM RSS1 RSS2