BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:30:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I think that the stations in the 1600-1710 portion of the AM band generally
use pretty low power. Also, there's little competition yet for frequencies
up there like there is for the more common freqs, so you don't have quite
the same problems. There's a station in Atlanta, WWAA, at 1690 that I was
listening to just this morning.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Canazzi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: below 160


Hi Kevin,

I hear a lot of stuff between 1600 and 1700 kHz.  I hear some stuff from
Tennessee and Alabama that I don't normally hear below 1600.  Also, I hear a
strong signal at 1700--which I believe is in Canada.  It's format is
African-American oriented.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2