BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:53:57 -0400
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1250"
From:
Kenneth Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Sorry for the confusion.  I suggested the Pro-95, but I overlooked the
bulletin on RadioReference that said your system will soon be moving to a
digital system.  Forget about the 95,  you'll soon need a digital trunk
tracker and the 96 is the most accessible (my opinion only).

Ken -N5SWR


-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of r.mcmanomy
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: correction


Well in that case I should go ahead and get a new scanner.
But I am getting confused.
I have one email saying Pro 95 and one say 96.
I know people are going to have different opinions but I just want to make
sure I get what I need to scan and something that with  or without a little
learning I can use the scanner.

Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach for
them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: correction


> Right, depending on the system you go to some have news of planned
> upgrades and other news when you first open the data page that contain
> system frequencies and things like that, and it sounds like they are
> planni to go digital as th news updated that they had ordered radios which
> would work on the syste's system there that is digital.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, r.mcmanomy wrote:
>
>> Is this Lafayette you are talking about?
>> Just because you can not see the stars does not mean you can not reach
>> for
>> them.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:39 PM
>> Subject: correction
>>
>>
>> > Hi everyone, I just checked radioreference.com, about that system in
>> > Indiana, and they are analogue at present, but from the system news on
>> > there it looks like they ahve future plans to go digital.
>> >
>>
>

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 6/17/2005
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2