BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:05:38 -0800
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (9 lines)
As I understand it, one of the reasons tuners such as the one in the 2000s
aren't as good is because of the way they tune.  In my 440 and 690 radios
I had, they were tuned with little motors that adjusted variable c
components.  In the 2000, relays click on and off adding capacitance, in
some cases either having too much or not enough.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2