Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Wrangham hypothesis
From:
Ingrid Bauer/Jean-Claude Catry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:45:49 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> Jean-Claude, what do you mean by 'cuisine'?  Not criticising, just
> curious.

cooking means putting a tuber or a carcass over a fire and eat very simply
that way , cuisine means having a pot of some sort and mixing and cooking
many ingredients together . a simple food like potato cooked allready
produce hundred of new molecules , so when you mixed many differnt food
together the possibilities pof recombinaison between them are end less
giving birth to a whole spectrum of new molecules that the body might or
might not be able to metabolise properlly as they are  molecules that  our
genetic have encountered  more or less  recently  ( the big shift from
cooking to  cuisine will have occured at the neolithic revolution )
i don't tell you how the industrial revolution and chemical agriculture have
worsen the trend .
jean-claude
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV