INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:08:50 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On 1/10/07, Emerson S Costa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> PT foder ( < basse-LA futere < LA futuere )
> ES joder
> IT fottere
> FR foutre
>
> Piet Cleij ha includite "futuer" in su dictionario
> interlingua-nederlandese.
>
> Necun de iste linguas romance retene le "u". Deberea le prototypo esser le
> forma non classic "futer"?
>

Poterea esser "foter", non? Pt, it e fr contine "o" e "t", mais non contine "u".

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2