Hi.

I haven't had the chance to do a side by side to compare the sensitivity or
selectivity between the Super Radio 2 and the Super Radio 3, but I'll agree
with you on the speaker and audio section.  The Super Radio 2 wins hands
down.  But either one of them has a better audio section than the
Sony.  That being said, I do like the Sony as a general purpose
MW/SW/FM/Air listening receiver.  Even though it doesn't seem quite as
sensitive on AM and FM, it still provides plenty of useful listening, and
I'm not a bit sorry I bought it.  I like having a selection of radios
because I find that various radios have strengths in different areas, and
to the extent that I can use that to my advantage, I'll hear more.

73, de Lou K2LKK

At 08:58 PM 9/27/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>     In my oppinion, the Super III. radio is not quite as selective or as
>
>sensitive as the older Super II on AM.  In addition, I don't think the FM on
>
>the super III. is as good as the FM was on the older Super II.  My old Super
>
>II. was so good that I wore the darn thing out over the last 16 years or so.
>
>HI!  HI!
>
>
>
>But, to get back to Bob's question, I'd still say the Super III. is better
>
>than any similarly-priced run-of-the mill AM/FM radio you could get.
>
>
>
>On another note, I don't think the speaker and sound quality of the Super
>
>III. is as good as my older Super II.
>
>
>
>Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: "Bob Humbert" <
>
>[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>To: <
>
>[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:21 PM
>
>Subject: Re: question
>
>
>
> > What do you think of it?  Is the sensitivity and selectivity any better
>
>than
>
> > the run of the mill portable radios?
>
> >

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753