BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:10:04 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (58 lines)
Has anyone tried using the version of JAWS that works for home on a
machine with Pro, and to what success?





On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Colin McDonald wrote:

> there are no noticeable differences between home and pro versions of either
> JAWS or windows xp.
> The xp pro has some more administrative options that are more accessible to
> the user then the home eddition...but ive been using home and pro on 2
> separate machines here and notice almost no difference between them as far
> as just general everyday use goes.
> I think pro is a little bit more responsive...a bit faster that is, doesn't
> clog up so offten as home does, i am refering to the OS that is.
> Im sure those who customize jaws or customize windows might have something
> different to say but for me and most windows users there isn't any
> difference at all...well maybe to the visual user yes but not to the
> visually impaired user.
> We might be getting a little off topic though guys? ya think?
> lol
> regards
> Colin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 10:36 PM
> Subject: Re: JAWS 6.0 arrived and what a surprise
>
>
> > What is the differents between the home and pro versions?  I just realized
> > that if I get a j there at this medical center they'll want me using one
> > of their machines, and my voc rehab counselor will have to get me 6.0 for
> > Pro, but for now I am going to use my laptop which has the home version.
> > See my last post here but 6.0 for home seems to have helped out with
> > regard to clearing out some of the issues I had with pages which had those
> > macromedia moovie thigns.  Not sure if Tom will need the home or pro
> > version, but I think that at our school they just have home, but  that
> > could have changed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Harvey Heagy wrote:
> >
> > > The thing is that if a person has the pro version of XP they must also
> have
> > > the pro version of JFW, and that is more expensive than a standard
> version
> > > upgrade.
> > > Harvey Heagy (N.5.H.A.U.)
> > >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2