Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:58:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ruth:
Jim is right. Although I used to have '65, '66, and '67 models (the latter a convertible) back in the mid 70's I now only have the newer body style similar to the one your son has.
Jim has a nice cruising car (a convertible) but one of mine has been raced on real race tracks (not drag strips) by me and another has a lot of experience on race tracks in the northeast, driven by a friend of mine and myself.
Three are the fastback model (the rest are regular coupes), three are V-8s (the rest are 4 cylinders), and all but one have standard transmissions.
I agree the old ones were nice and I've considered buying one again but I'm pretty heavily invested in the newer style now (though still well under $10,000).
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Pre-patinated plastic gumby block w/ coin slot
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jim
Follett
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 8:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BP] Mustang --the car
Ruth:
Bruce doesn't have any Mustangs you would be interested in. Trust me, one
of them is mom's 4 cylinder, 84 model. FYI, I have an 01 Cobra.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Pre-patinated plastic gumby block w/ coin slot
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Ruth
Barton
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 12:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [BP] Mustang --the car
What sort of Mustangs. I like the early ones, '64, '65. My son has an '89
that he thinks is just wonderful and I don't like the looks of it at all.
Ruth
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|