Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:07:06 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<004f01c48d2d$919321c0$04e235d1@default> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Cuyler Page wrote:
> Ya, frankly, I am a monogamous pipe guy. For me, especially with a
> phone line i-net connection, this duality of pipes is too much like
> the extreme Mormon set of polygamists out here. Very glad, though,
> (even envious) for those of you who can manipulate it.
>
> I rather preferred the casual ease of the Bradbury "Fahrenheit 451"
> approach to e-wallpaper and the relaxed virtual daily soap opera of
> Ralph and Ruth.
So those who have paid their dues get to stay and the freeloaders to the
Ruth & Ralph soap opera get their pipes cut free. An historical rectomy?
Or, we could compare the two pipes to the qualitative difference between
using hand and power tools.
][<
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|