if we did away with analogue all at once, and I was the manufacturer of
digital receivers and transmitting capabilities, ide be very happy
indeed...especially if i had some pull with the FCC and other regulatory
federal agencies...or if i had some financial interests in the current
governmental administration...lol
but of course, i am not by any means suggesting a conspiracy to force the
public to do something they dont want to!!
just random thoughts, no personal opinions here!
Regards
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
> I would opt for something that doesn't make noise into analogue. Can you
> imagine if we did away with analogue all at once? I wouldn't want to go
> there.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:31 PM
> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>
>
> > I've heard that like many other standards, we're one of the few
countries
> > using, or still playing with it. I think IBOC's been a debate around
radio
> > awhile now. I think I've heard of stories where stations have tried it
and
> > decided to turn it off because it needs so much spectrum to run. I think
> > the
> > only way we could really go digital with radio with current technology
is
> > to
> > eliminate analog at once, or develope something that doesn't make noise
> > noticable in to the analog audio.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
> >
> >
> >> I don't know, and that is what I am wondering if this is maybe
something
> >> that isn't in the testing phase for right now.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:18 PM
> >> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
> >>
> >>
> >> > Yeah, in dad's truck it works fine, but I heard IBOC makes the deal
> > worse,
> >> > and well, if there's no receivers for it out, who's listening to the
> >> > digital
> >> > signal?
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:02 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I've gotten WTMJ from here in Michigan, but that could cause a
problem
> > if
> >> >> you are in an apartment building with a lot of computers and RF.
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:57 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >I heard WTMJ in Milwaukee started using it too, that's one station
> >> >> >you
> >> > just
> >> >> > don't get in Green Bay, not in an apartment anyways, takes being
in
> >> >> > a
> >> > car
> >> >> > for some of those distant ones, heard IBOC makes the problem
worse.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:31 PM
> >> >> > Subject: IBOC AM question
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi everyone, I have been hearing a few things here and there
about
> >> >> >> IBOC
> >> >> >> digital on AM and some short-wave stuff, and I have a few
stations
> >> > around
> >> >> >> the Detroit area that I think are using the IBOC. This includes
> >> >> >> WWJ
> >> > and
> >> >> >> WCHB 1200 and our family life station WUFL, 1030. Has anyone
used
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> receiver that will work with IBOC and what have your opinions
been
> > and
> >> > do
> >> >> >> you all have any suggestions as to what to invest in?
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
|
