C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:24:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (197 lines)
thanks kat, i have not looked at state by state polls
in some time.
--- Kat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> So far they are concentrating on Kerry vs. Bush, not
> Edwards vs. Cheney.  We
> shall see after tomorrow.
>
> I thought it was interesting that in an area that
> has traditionally been
> pro-Republican, Kerry came out way ahead of Bush in
> a local poll about the
> debate.  As for voting, Kerry is slightly ahead of
> Bush.
>
> Kat
>
> On Monday 04 October 2004 11:12 pm, ken barber
> wrote:
> > speaking of north carolina, are they going to do
> to
> > edwards what tenn. did to their homeboy gore? just
> > asking your opinion. are the polls matching what
> you
> > are seeing?
> >
> > --- Kat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > I have never been a debator myself - it'd be a
> bit
> > > difficult if you can't hear
> > > everything your opponent says - but I've been to
> a
> > > few at schools and if the
> > > rules are followed, it is a matter of facts, not
> > > emotions.  The purpose is to
> > > disprove your opponent by logic and facts, not
> > > emotional displays or attacks.
> > >
> > > So I'm sure they were being "gentlenanly" in
> this
> > > round.  I'm also sure the
> > > gloves will come off next time.  I'm looking
> forward
> > > to seeing my homeboy
> > > tomorrow night.
> > >
> > > Kat
> > >
> > > On Monday 04 October 2004 10:24 pm, ken barber
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > well, it would appear to me that all of these
> > >
> > > would
> > >
> > > > have been a weakness on one side or the other.
> i
> > > > actually think the questions were pretty mild.
> i
> > > > hardly consider what i saw as being a debate
> of
> > > > substance. but on what i saw, i have to say
> kerry
> > >
> > > won
> > >
> > > > that.
> > > > maybe it was the final agreed upon format. i
> don't
> > > > know why i was sort of disappointed in the
> > >
> > > questions.
> > >
> > > > but, i was not asking them.
> > > >
> > > > --- Kat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > > Because, as I believe is one of the primary
> > >
> > > rules of
> > >
> > > > > debate, you don't tout
> > > > > your own sucesses but attempt to point out
> the
> > > > > weaknesses in your opponent's
> > > > > arguements.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kat
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday 04 October 2004 09:35 pm, ken
> barber
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > okay guys, i have traced down all the
> leads
> > >
> > > and i
> > >
> > > > > come
> > > > >
> > > > > > to the conclusion that cameron had a sense
> of
> > > > >
> > > > > humor
> > > > >
> > > > > > that got out of hand.this guy appears to
> have
> > >
> > > been
> > >
> > > > > > with kerry (assigned to report on his
> > >
> > > campaign)
> > >
> > > > > for
> > > > >
> > > > > > more than a year. if i had to do that, i'd
> > >
> > > just
> > >
> > > > > had to
> > > > >
> > > > > > go out and hang myself. this is hardly
> news.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > now more seriously, looking at the debate,
> > >
> > > which
> > >
> > > > > any
> > > > >
> > > > > > objective onlooker has to give the nod to
> > >
> > > kerry),
> > >
> > > > > i
> > > > >
> > > > > > found it a little strange, that the prison
> > >
> > > scandle
> > >
> > > > > did
> > > > >
> > > > > > not come up, nor did kerry's 20 year
> record in
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > > > > senate, nor did the cia's africa
> investigation
> > >
> > > on
> > >
> > > > > > buying the rods, nor the 911 commissions
> > >
> > > report.
> > >
> > > > > 90
> > > > >
> > > > > > minutes and none of these were even
> mentioned.
> > > > >
> > > > > just my
> > > > >
> > > > > > obsevation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your
> > >
> > > mobile
> > >
> > > > > phone.
> > > > >
> > > > > > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote
> today!
> > > > http://vote.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > http://vote.yahoo.com
>




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

ATOM RSS1 RSS2