Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Library Access -- http://www.rit.edu/~easi |
Date: | Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:16:21 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe there is a confusion about California and 508.
I believe that the community colleges have taken the firm position that 508
applies or at least that they will act as though it applies.
I believe that it is the California State University system that is
waffling, and I am not at all sure that the University of California has
yet taken any position.
Norman Coombs
CEO EASIAt 11:17 AM 7/2/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Ron Stewart, Director of the Technology Access Program, Information
>Services, at Oregon State University, wanted a copy of the California
>Community Colleges statement about Section 508 not applying to their system.
>Although I do not have a copy of this statement, I find it interesting to
>note that this higher education system published their guidelines to
>distance education in August 1999. To many in the field, these guidelines
>serve as a model to implementing accessibility in distance education for
>students and faculty. Most likely, these guidelines would support Section
>508 implementation. Please see:
>http://www.HTCTU.FHDA.EDU/dlguidelines/final%20dl%20guidelines.htm
>
>Carol Boyer
>Project Associate
>RESNA Technical Assistance Project
>1700 N. Moore Street, Suite 1540
>Arlington, VA 22209
>703/524-6686, x- 309 (V)
>703/524-6639 (TTY)
>703/524-6630 (Fax)
>[log in to unmask]
>http://www.resna.org/taproject
>
|
|
|