BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cuyler Page <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pre-patinated plastic gumby block w/ coin slot <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:03:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> The guy next door gets told flat-out no for a similar
> application.  One day, a refurb permit is a flat $25, the next it's based
on
> square footage for the same space.  We just point and laugh and be on our
> merry way.


These discussions about officialdom always bring to mind the thoroughly
democratic method used here by residents of one Area in the local Regional
District (like a Township in a County) to eliminate the Building Inspector
from their lives.   They found a bylaw that allowed for creation of a
referendum item to be included on the ballot at election time, posted the
proper notices of referendum and then simply successfully voted in a new
bylaw that said no Regional District Building Inspector could enter their
Area (like a township) and that no building permits were, henceforth,
required.   A few years later the neighbouring Area saw the benefits and did
the same.   Strangely, the press have kept very quiet about it all, and this
wonderful application of democratic freedom of empowerment never made news
anywhere beyond the local Areas.

cp in wild bc

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2