Yeah.  Uh huh, there were some, I say, some differences.  Pathetic is what
you'll be soon enough!!!  (laughing)

Vicki

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: A Dream


> Vicki,
>
> Does this mean you are questioning my pathetic dream of great spiritual
> import?  This could severely modify the interpretation of my dream if it
> wasn't as described.  It is the way you described the experience to me,
> excuse me, I meant to say, it was the way I dreamed it.  I can only report
> the truth.  It is remotely possible that I could have, by accident of
> course, somewhat embellished the dream but if so, it would be the first
time
> in my life I ever exaggerated and that is no exaggeration.  So, Vicki,
> interpretor of all dreams, what was the truth I missed?  Was it about the
> perfect executed swan dive?  It could have been much worse, of course, my
> dream I am referring to now.  For example, the poor blind woman in my
dream
> could have been wearing a skirt, in which case, I would have to have had
to
> radically modified the telling of the dream to protect to feminine
integrity
> of the make believe party in the dream.  Come to think of it, were you
> wearing a skirt, Vicki?  Don't answer that question.  I would rather not
> know the answer.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> Phil.
>