BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 220 update
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:58:52 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines) 
I know now, and before a few days ago I haven't spent much time with 220
MHz, and assumed that those systems were digital and would require more
equipment which I may or may not get depending on what I find.  Is there
any place where 220 MHz is active?  I don't know if anyone reads Mobile
Radio Technology, but there they have articles talking about 220 and its
promises all the time.





On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Harvey Heagy wrote:

> I think Kennwood wasted its effort putting 220 meters into the T.H.F.6.-A.
> because there is little activity on that band.  They probably would have
> done better with 6 meters or another more active band.  73.
> Harvey (N.5.H.A.U.)
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2