BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 220 update
From:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:02:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines) 
I think Kennwood wasted its effort putting 220 meters into the T.H.F.6.-A.
because there is little activity on that band.  They probably would have
done better with 6 meters or another more active band.  73.
Harvey (N.5.H.A.U.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2