Hi.
Personally, I think the Kenwood TS520S with a MC50 mic sounded pretty
darned good. I'm not saying Yaesu doesn't, although Yaesu, as a company
isn't my cup of tea, and when I am shopping for HF radios it is usually a
contest between Icom and Kenwood and Yaesu doesn't even enter the picture.
Having said that, I also think that many of the radios made in the '60s and
'70s had nicer sounding audio than what I am hearing on the air today.
However, I suspect that this is like comparing Fords, Chevvys, and
Chryslers. There are some good models and some turkeys from each company,
and everyone has an opinion of who is best. More than likely, different
people like different aspects of the transmitted audio as well.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 12:33 AM 5/24/2005 -0600, you wrote:
>an FT101E with a mc60 or mc80 mike on it, or even a d-104 with the dynamic
>head will out perform any radio on the market as far as full bodied audio
>goes, except for perhaps the 1000MP...or unless you have a kenwood or Icom
>with allot of audio gear such as equalizers, compressors processing and
>gating on before it gets to the mike preamp.
>I do grant you though, many of yaesu's current radios do lack good audio...i
>refer to 897, 857 and those sorts of rigs...when i say yaesu, i do refer to
>all of their radio equipment in general not just what they have produced in
>the last 10 years only.
>This is where opinions become more prevalent then actual fact i suppose, but
>given a kenwood, icom and yaesu, all of the same vintage and same general
>specifications, the yaesu's, at least, in the past, will out do audio on HF
>as far as lows and midrange is concerned...kenwood and icom have always
>focused on the mid to hi mid range frequencies in the audio and accentuated
>the highs, supposedly for better punch through dx or noisy conditions.
>It really depends upon what your ears want to hear, and of course, with
>modern rigs, there are DSP and pass band controls which allow the listener
>of the received audio to pretty much make it as basy or high pitched as they
>so desire thus more or less making any incoming signal sound great.
>Even built in receiver equalization controls are common on the new rigs
>giving even more flexibility to the heard audio.
>With these flexible controls at the receiver, the tailoring or better
>quality of the other stations transmitted audio becomes less and less
>important, although, still remains fairly important in order to give a solid
>stable and well resonant platform for the different receiver controls to
>work with.
>
>only opinion here guys, im not stating this as fact or anything just what i
>have experienced and what my ideas on the subject are at this present time
>hi hi.
>73
>Colin, V A6BKX
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 8:55 PM
>Subject: Re: ts-480 and kwnwood receivers
>
>
> > I still say nothing, especially a yaesu, will never ever in a billion
>years
> > beat Kenwood audio on hf, just never will happen.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: ts-480 and kwnwood receivers
> >
> >
> > well...the 1000MP mark 5 is accessible when used with terbo logger and an
> > old DOS computer. I say accesible in that you can get frequency read out
> > through the terbo logger software.
> > There was mention of some sort of talking frequency counter or frequency
> > analizer that could be made to talk a while ago...but since those arent
> > readily accessible then most yaesu DX rigs are pretty unattainable by the
> > visually impaired.
> > If i didn't need at the least frequency read out, i would automatically
>buy
> > a yaesu simply because they have the worlds best audio quality on HF
> > transmit without a contest.
> > 73
> > Colin, V A6BKX
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Keith Barrett" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 1:52 PM
> > Subject: ts-480 and kwnwood receivers
> >
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > Been reading the comparison between ts480 and ic-746 pro discussion
> > > with interest.
> > >
> > > Someone mentioned that the only kenwood in production better than the
> > > ts480 is the ts-870. Interesting that a 10 year old design should be
> > > better than their latest offering.
> > >
> > > As an interesting point though, how much is accessibility worth? I
> > > think that the ic-756 pro 3 would out perform any kenwood on the
> > > market as would the ft1000 mark 5.
> > >
> > > It seems to me that kenwood are heading towards the gymic end of the
> > > market and while it is good for us from an accessibility stand, if
> > > accessibility means us not having access to the top of the line
> > > radios, that is not so good.
> > >
> > > I wonder if kenwood will bring out anything again to compeat with the
> > > big guns. After all, if I did not have to think accessibility, I
> > > would not consider anything they are making at present so their
> > > market share must be falling?
> > >
> > > Keith
> > >
> > > - - - -
> > >
> > > Keith Barrett
> > > email <barrettpianos.co.uk>
> > > Amateur radio callsign gw4nby
> > > Bridgend, South Wales
> > >
> >
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|