BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bob Tinney <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:44:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Bob Tinney <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Sorry for the repeat, but here is my previous message without all of the
garbage.

Hi,

I don't want to throw cold water on the B & w antennas, but the ones that I
have heard have had consistently weak signal reports from this qth.  I guess
that there swr readings are very good and that they are quite broadbanded,
but the signals that I have heard from stations using those antennas have
been consistently 2 to 3 s units weaker than signals from other antennas
using the same power.  If you don't mind running more power than is
necessary to make up for the antennas inefficiencies, its a good choice.
Bob Tinney, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
  From: Richard and Karlene
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 2:25 PM
  Subject: hf wire antennas


  Hi;
  I have been very interest in the b & w antenna info.  How long is the
folded
  B & W dipole that folks seem to have had luck with?  Do we have any idea
  what comes with their mounting kit? I looked at it on line and it didn't
  really answer any questions.
  I am using a r8 vertical which works reasonably well except for the noise
  level.
  Rich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2