Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:00:26 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tom,
The "sighted world" argument works fine for me when we're talking about
businesses and organizations that don't directly have anything to do with
disability. Even then, however, I go for as much accessibility as I can
get. I hold all disability related organizations to the highest possible
standards of accessibility.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Revisiting accessible amateur radio study materials.
> Darrell, perhaps you missed my original message but I did say there were
> several
> federal laws in play with this. I agree that there are probably some
> aspects to
> things which could be made more accessible but ultimately so long as we
> live in
> a sighted world not totally so. For example, I do not ever simply sign
> forms
> from people I do not know just because they are sent me via the mail. I
> will
> get a reader to check them before I sign. Since I do ive alone in a rural
> area
> it always requires getting a reader. Since I need the reader anyway and
> will
> have to pay for an hour of service I might as well just have them fill out
> the
> form. What I generally do is have the person on the phone read me the
> form so
> that I have all answers ready when the reader is available and I can
> rapidly
> complete the form. Perhaps teaching at a university where my student's
> papers
> are not necessarily in accessible formats has mellowed me a bit on all of
> this
> but I usually at least try not to bite the hand that feeds me.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
|
|
|