Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 1999 06:26:10 -1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jean-Louis Tu wrote:
>
> Forest:
> > i think you are overreacting here and taking these ideas out of context. it's
> > not hard to see that "his-story" is full of examples of male
> > dominant behavior in "hu-man" species. almost any "per-son" can see
> > it. even our languages reflect it.
>
> History, human, person come from latin words (historia, homo,
> persona). Man (=male human) is "vir" in latin, son is "filius" in
> latin, etc.
>
> --Jean-Louis Tu <[log in to unmask]
you seem to defend all your arguments from a book, i think that is important,
but i think there's more to understanding the huWoMan psyche than that, on
subconscious and evolutionary intuitive levels. i would suggest spending more
time developing your intuitive capacities to balance left and right brain
activities. to need to prove everthing by scientific fact and books is
important, just keep in mind science and books may not have all the answers,
some may need intuition factors added to round them out. most of the well
known inventitive scientists will say they are guided by an intuitive process
as well as academic pursuits. an itense academic study of root language theory
may help defend the point i was trying to make above.
|
|
|