BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:27:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Hi John;

I believe that there quality control is just about gone.

The reason why there ham radio prices are so cheap is because they use the
amateurs to field test there radios so they can cut out there quality
control.

I'll also be more than happy to stay with ICOM and KENWOOD.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: 220 update


> OK, I wasn't sure, not up on yaesu stuff, from what I hear they're losing
> some credibility in the sighted world as well, quality control is way down
> it looks like with the newer radios. Hmmmm, I'll stick with Kenwood and
> Icom
> for the foreseeable future.  Thanks for the info though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: 220 update
>
>
>> Its the VX7R.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: 220 update
>>
>>
>>> yaesu makes one that does all 4, I forget which one it is though not
>>> being
>>> a
>>> yaesu fan in the least.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:07 PM
>>> Subject: Re: 220 update
>>>
>>>
>>>> Not much here at lesst on the surface, but I heard that there was
>>>> supposed
>>>> to be a radio that was going to do 2-meters, 220 & 440 as well as
>>>> 6-meters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Harvey Heagy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Well, maybe that's why the T.H.F.6.-A. has stayed around so long.  In
>>>>> an
>>>>> era
>>>>>  of constantly changing models, names and features that rig has
>>>>> miraculously
>>>>>  survived, and maybe that's why.  But we don't have much, if any, 220
>>>>> meter
>>>>>  activity in this area.  73.
>>>>>  Harvey (N.5.H.A.U.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2