Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:43:59 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Jeff;
JAWS 6 is magnificent!!!
It is much more responsive.
I've never used it except on the IRLP site but, I do use it on ECHOLINK and
it works great.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: electronic qsling
> Hi Tom and the group. Have you upgraded versions of JAWS? I currently
> use 5.1 and would like to try it out some time too with my IRLP contacts,
> but don't know naything about this. I really want to get my hands on 6.0
> because I heard that it is supposed to really be a big improvement over
> 5.1 even.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Tom Behler wrote:
>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, has anyone had success with either EQSL or Logbook
>> Of
>> The World as a way to do electronic qsls?
>>
>> A while back, I had tried e-qsl with Jaws 3.7 and Windows 98 SE, and
>> found
>> it to be a disaster in terms of accessibility.
>>
>> Have things improved?
>>
>> Anyone tried LOTW?
>>
>> Is it easier to use than E-QSL?
>>
>> I now have Jaws 5.0 with Windows XP.
>>
>>
>> Best 73 from Tom Behler: Kb8TYJ
>>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.4 - Release Date: 2/1/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.4 - Release Date: 2/1/2005
|
|
|