The superradio II is better than the III from all of the reports I've read.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:58 PM
Subject: question


>     In my oppinion, the Super III. radio is not quite as selective or as
>
> sensitive as the older Super II on AM.  In addition, I don't think the FM
on
>
> the super III. is as good as the FM was on the older Super II.  My old
Super
>
> II. was so good that I wore the darn thing out over the last 16 years or
so.
>
> HI!  HI!
>
>
>
> But, to get back to Bob's question, I'd still say the Super III. is better
>
> than any similarly-priced run-of-the mill AM/FM radio you could get.
>
>
>
> On another note, I don't think the speaker and sound quality of the Super
>
> III. is as good as my older Super II.
>
>
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Bob Humbert" <
>
> [log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> To: <
>
> [log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:21 PM
>
> Subject: Re: question
>
>
>
> > What do you think of it?  Is the sensitivity and selectivity any better
>
> than
>
> > the run of the mill portable radios?
>
> >
>