BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:04:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Used to be, here, only a couple repeaters used a PL, but as time goes on,
now there are only a couple that don't and I hear for 1 it's being
suggested. As I've traveled through CT, and NY and all over the years, it
seems like they all have a PL there though I haven't been on a CT repeater
in over a year now and that was for 2 minutes, it's been years since I've
had a real conversation on one.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: PL Required for Repeater Coordination


> That is an interesting way of doing things.  I noticed something about
> repeaters acooss the lake from me in Michigan in Canada that very few if
> any use PL tones.  Is this the case in other areas.  For some repeaters
> you try to get into this is good, and for others it can be difficult if
> you are trying to bring up a distant repeater with a tone and you bring up
> the on e without.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2