Yea, I'm probably going to get another one.


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: new ht icom vs kenwood


> I like to use the B band of my TH-F6A for a scanner. It's great! scans a
> little slow, but still, sitting out on the deck when we have nice days or
on
> vacation, best money I ever spent, with the T90A being a close second
though
> if the T90A could do that I think it would be first due to the metal case
on
> it and I like the way some of the functions work on that radio a little
> better,  all told, they are in a dead tie for my favorite and I like and
use
> both a lot.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: new ht icom vs kenwood
>
>
> > Hi Chris;
> >
> > If you memorize your memory locations, you really don't need the cw
> readout
> > however, every little bit helps.
> >
> > Also, I don't understand why you would want to listen to radio or TV
> > frequencies with a $249 ht because, then you are not able to listen to
the
> > amateur frequencies at the same time.
> >
> > I put the baseball game on the (b) band of the F6 and turn down the
volume
> > on that band to the low setting.
> >
> > So that if I am monitoring an amateur repeater, the audio is slightly
> > louder.
> >
> > But this is only my perspective.
> >
> > 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:18 PM
> > Subject: new ht icom vs kenwood
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > Buddy,
> > > I'm surprised that the cw frequency readout on the ict-90a wouldn't
sway
> > > your decision.  That was a big factor in my decision.
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> >
>