LISTSERV - BLIND-HAMS Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BLIND-HAMS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: New At Sign, was: Morse code
From:	shawn klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sat, 8 May 2004 12:29:32 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (34 lines)

Cool! never thought of it.

--- Steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Amen, I'm all for a super-Extra designator too.
>
> By the way, I haven't seen it on this list, but the
> International
> Telecommunications Union has approved
> dit-dah-dah-dit-dah-dit as the at-sign
> so we can now send e-mail addresses in Code.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Baracco" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 1:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Morse code
>
>
> They should invent a super extra class for those of
> us who did it the old
> way.  (SMILE)!
>
> Andy
> WQ6R





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG