BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:46:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
better not tell either manufacturer that  lol.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner of J. E. M. Racing http://home.comcast.net/~jemracing5/wsb/index.html
AIM screen name: JEMracing3
MSN messenger: [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Baracco" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes


| At work, i use a Dell 933 mhz. Pentium III machine running windows 2000 on
| a network.  The network administrator remotely controls all of the PC's on
| the network using MS SMS remote video drivers.  Until recently, I was
using
| JFW version 5.0 on that machine exclusively.  in Outlook Express, JFW
would
| not read the fields in a message, such as TO, CC, BCC, SUBJECT, etc.  It
| would just say "EDIT".  This in spite of experimenting with color depth,
| color scheme, resolution, etc.  Tech support at FS said that JFW does have
| problems coexisting with remote video drivers.  I recently installed
| Window-Eyes on that machine.  The reading problems in OE were not present,
| and, get this, when i unloaded WE and loaded JFW, it no longer failed to
| read those fields.  Go figure!  Window-Eyes actually made JFW work better.
|
| What do you think of that?
|
| Andy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2