BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:26:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Nope, not yet in ham radio, would cause too much confusion and I would think
be very expensive.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Accessible 220 MHz Radios


> Oh, they've started using trunking on ham bands? That would be kind of
> interesting, but doubt ham radio has yet seen trunking, or they call it
> something else.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Accessible 220 MHz Radios
>
>
> > Well, I would never know because of the inactivity there.  From 222-225
we
> > have a few MPT-1327 trunking systems around here, but that's about it.
> What
> > makes it better then the other bands?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kysor" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: Accessible 220 MHz Radios
> >
> >
> > > what ticks me off is that half the band was going to u p s but low and
> > > behold, they're not using it much either.
> > > two twenty is a fantastic band with the best propogation of any of the
> uhf
> > > vhf bands.
> > > dan
> > > At 03:31 PM 6/14/04, Louis Kim Kline wrote:
> > > >Hi to all.
> > > >
> > > >Well, it would be hard to justify keeping the band based on the
> activity
> > in
> > > >Rochester. It's too bad, because the 220 MHz band is a really great
> band,
> > > >with characteristics very much like 2 meters. I think that ham clubs
> need
> > > >to make a concerted effort to develop this band if we expect to keep
> > > >it. The best way to do that is to approach manufactures and see if
they
> > > >would be willing to give group discounts to sell a whole bunch of
> radios
> > at
> > > >once. This does two things--it encourages manufacturers to make other
> > > >models available for the band, and it raises the level of activity on
> the
> > > >band which in turn encourages others to buy radios for the band and
> > > >encourages people to put up repeaters on the band.
> > > >
> > > >73, de Lou K2LKK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Louis Kim Kline
> > > >A.R.S. K2LKK
> > > >Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > > >Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > > >Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2