BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 May 2005 20:52:32 +0100
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Organization:
piano tuning
From:
Keith Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi all

Been reading the comparison between ts480 and ic-746 pro discussion
with interest.

Someone mentioned that the only kenwood in production better than the
ts480 is the ts-870.  Interesting that a 10 year old design should be
better than their latest offering.

As an interesting point though, how much is accessibility worth?  I
think that the ic-756 pro 3 would out perform any kenwood on the
market as would the ft1000 mark 5.

It seems to me that kenwood are heading towards the gymic end of the
market and while it is good for us from an accessibility stand, if
accessibility means us not having access to the top of the line
radios, that is not so good.

I wonder if kenwood will bring out anything again to compeat with the
big guns.  After all, if I did not have to think accessibility, I
would not consider anything they are making at present so their
market share must be falling?

Keith

- - - -

Keith Barrett
email <barrettpianos.co.uk>
Amateur radio callsign gw4nby
Bridgend, South Wales

ATOM RSS1 RSS2