Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:53:33 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
grouch.
On Jan 19, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Pamela S. Follett wrote:
> no
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Callan
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 08:16
> Subject: Re: [BP] an urgent
>
> Thanks for the $350K Ralph. I'd like some more please. Since you
> aren't giving any to Pam, could I have her share?
>
> -jc
>
> On Jan 19, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Pamela S. Follett wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 07:45
> Subject: Re: [BP] an urgent
>
>
> In a message dated 1/19/2005 7:43:37 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
> On second thought, I'd rather get it from you guys. And guyettes.
> Thanks for recognizing we can dish it out with the best of them.
>
>
>
> Ralph Pam
>
> You are indeed in rarified company. But I'm not giving you $350,000.
> I won't feel bad about it if you tell me you're not giving ANYONE
> $350K.
>
>
>
> Ralph Pam
>
|
|
|