Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:34:23 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You left the bark on because the Hessians left the bark on, but, would the
Hessians have sprayed with borates? Ruth
At 3:00 PM -0500 12/4/04, Gabriel Orgrease wrote:
>Ruth Barton wrote:
>
>>It's not a good idea to leave the bark on logs used for building as it
>>attracts insects. Ruth
>>
>>
>Ruth,
>
>Agreed, possibly... but in this case the bark would not have been
>removed by the Hessians and therefore the insect attractive little hut
>has bark.
>When we first went there on a warm sunny day to look at removing the old
>logs there was the most amazing assortment of different types of bees &
>wasps that I have ever seen.
>This last week all of the wood, some of it infested with powder post
>beetle & some w/ termites, with the exception of the new cedar was
>sprayed twice over with borates.
>
>][<
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Dummerston, VT
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|