Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:15:41 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--237408437 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I suppose that would depend on one's context. Do Not Resuscitate
doesn't come up all that often in my daily routine, Department of
Natural Resources comes up at regular intervals.
-jc
On Jul 13, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Pamela Stevenson wrote:
> Doesn't DNR usually stand for Do Not Resuscitate?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Easy bent lead pipe.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John
> Callan
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BP] SLAY MOST FOWL
>
> The DNR caught a bunch of 60 year olds who apparently were trying to
> set a new record for "over the limit fishing" this weekend. Over by
> about 600. SUNNIES for goodness sake!
> -jc
>
>
> On Jul 13, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Met History wrote:
>
>
> In a mess, [log in to unmask] writes:
> Parks officials are hunting a Queens quackpot who snapped the necks
> of six defenseless ducks nesting
> as opposed to six ducks armed with rpg's
|
|
|