Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:43:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You: Are a stinker!
-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Swayze
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Wine and Stops, now Saturated Fats
Bruce > PROVE that raw milk causes problems
Let's walk through a hypothetical conversation between you and me.
You: Raw milk is good for you.
Me: That's strange since I know that pasteurized milk is not. Has the
process of pasteurization changed the milk sugars and proteins to cause
it
to be healthy?
You: The Masai thrive on it.
Me: Really? Some say that certain Indian groups "thrive" on corn. But
we
know better. So would the Masai perhaps have been better off without
the
consumption of milk? Assuming that they are truly healthy, is that so
despite its consumption? And, hey, wait a minute. You never answered
my
question about how pasteurization makes a healthy product unhealthy.
You: Raw milk is good for you.
Me: Ok, we'll let the Masai question slide. How about some proof to
your
claim that it's good for you.
You: Prove it isn't.
|
|
|