INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:11:05 -0400
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: dunc
From:
"Jay B." <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
Car Kjell e Stan, e alteres,
Como vos dice "Interessante",
e si, ma pro le Collateralista
e forsan non pro le INTERLNG.

Per favor continua le discussion
de "dunque" e "donc" in le lista
[log in to unmask]

Isto esserea un cosa amabile si vos
lo face. Cata lista a su thema e cata
thema in su lista ;-)

Con salutes amical,
Jay B.

2005/8/5, Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>:
> Stanley Mulaik wrote:
> 
> >Interessante.  Proque AD + TUNC non es ATUNC o ADUNC.
> >Como ha le a- essite perdite?
> >

=====================================================Pro disabonar te del lista, invia un message a
[log in to unmask] con le texto:

  UNSUBSCRIBE INTERLNG

o visita le sito del lista:

  http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/interlng.html
=====================================================Visita le sito official del Union Mundial pro
Interlingua:

  http://www.interlingua.com/
=====================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2