Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | This isn`t an office, it`s hell with fluorescent lighting. |
Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:08:11 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hold on a second Ralph. What about "adhere to all applicable codes,
ordinances, regulations, laws and cultural norms"? My guess is even
the NRA might have some objection to this use of a firearm, indoors and
not on a range! Then there's the matter of permits. Is this a
concealed weapon...or is it one prominantly displated in the back
window? Consistancy could be a problem too...unless you are going for
a work of ART. Hey, its your spec...I suddenly have NO Opinion...NO
knowledge...No association....Never been there...don't know what you
all are talking about.
-jc
(And that Jerome if you are still listening is a demonstration of
sudden onset professional liability).
On Dec 12, 2003, at 9:24 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> In a message dated 12/12/2003 4:49:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> What about steel bird shot on a really wide choke?
> Means and methods I guess... huh?
> This is a technology with which I am unfamiliar. Will have to rely on
> the Contractor's submittals (samples most definitely required) to
> demonstrate whether results will be acceptable. Problems are
> anticipated in equal spacing and alignment of holes, and avoidance
> of a "scattershot" appearance.
>
> Ralph
|
|
|