[log in to unmask] wrote:
> In a message dated 12/12/2003 9:52:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> there is no reason to cheapen the high level of discourse here by
> using barnyard vulgarism
>
> *Sir:*
> **
> *You have made a common (which is to say vulgar) error in taking a
> technical term widely accepted and understood within the construction
> industry (and as I understand it, other industries, as well as the
> legal and medical fraternities) for a common barnyard epithet.*
> **
> *Ralph*
OK... now I'm wondering just what the technical term was.
][<en
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>