Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:39:09 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I like to use the B band of my TH-F6A for a scanner. It's great! scans a
little slow, but still, sitting out on the deck when we have nice days or on
vacation, best money I ever spent, with the T90A being a close second though
if the T90A could do that I think it would be first due to the metal case on
it and I like the way some of the functions work on that radio a little
better, all told, they are in a dead tie for my favorite and I like and use
both a lot.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: new ht icom vs kenwood
> Hi Chris;
>
> If you memorize your memory locations, you really don't need the cw
readout
> however, every little bit helps.
>
> Also, I don't understand why you would want to listen to radio or TV
> frequencies with a $249 ht because, then you are not able to listen to the
> amateur frequencies at the same time.
>
> I put the baseball game on the (b) band of the F6 and turn down the volume
> on that band to the low setting.
>
> So that if I am monitoring an amateur repeater, the audio is slightly
> louder.
>
> But this is only my perspective.
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:18 PM
> Subject: new ht icom vs kenwood
>
>
> > Hello,
> > Buddy,
> > I'm surprised that the cw frequency readout on the ict-90a wouldn't sway
> > your decision. That was a big factor in my decision.
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
|
|
|