Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:28:05 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Transmitting isn't a problem, you just need to
identify yourself along with the link's call. And it's
a good idea to tell the stations you're talking to to
wait a few seconds before they come back. I don't know
if they hear an over beep on HF or not, and it takes a
second or two for you to send the receive command, and
for the link to receive the command and turn around to
receive. I made 1 contact with it on 17 and had no
problems with it, haven't messed with it since then.
--- Bob Martin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I think you're too close to that site. There it a
> link out west that works
> better for me, however, I haven't had the nerve to
> try to transmit, just
> listen.
>
> 73
> Bob Martin
> KC3FI
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tracy" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:13 AM
> Subject: question about hf links
>
>
> > Hello.
> > Has any one on here used this w4mq hf link that
> can either be used with
> echo
> > link or a web enterface?
> > If so what was your result?
> > I am thinking about going to the w4mq page and
> downloading the web
> > tranciever if I hear some one on here has positive
> results with that.
> > I have not figured out how to use the
> echotranciever used with echo link
> as
> > of yet.
> > Tracy kk4ql.
> >
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
|
|
|