Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:12:40 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have used both. From a performance standpoint, the SCSI drives are
probably better, but in practice, you will probably not notice a difference.
However, on most systems, it is easier to boot from an IDE drive than SCSI.
The choice is yours, but I would probably boot from SCSI just because it
SHOULD be the better performer :) .
Peter
-----------------------------------------------
The NoSpin Group
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
I have 2 choices of drive, they are both 7200RPM, both Seagate but that's
where the similarities stop. I use an Adaptec Ultra2 SCSI controller (4+
years old at this stage) and 36GB Ultra2 SCSI drive, and in the past this
combination has worked well but not necessarily mind-blowing in terms of
performance.
Jerry O'Connell.
Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|