Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Popular press representation of Paleo eating
From:
Eva Hedin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 21:15:57 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
> And the supposed short lifetimes are most likely assumed due to lack of
> signs of "aging" on bones. IMHO these signs are probably caused by modern
> diet.
>
Of course it is true that many of them died early - so would we do if we
didn't have treatments against parasites and infections and childbirth; just
like people do in other countries. In Afganistan for instance life
expectancy is 42 years. The issue is, I think that they did not die from
diseases inflicted by the food they ate. It stands to reason that if we
believe that people ate meat from animals then it cannot be dangerous to eat
saturated fat and if we believe that wild game was not very fat then it is
very likely good not to eat to much of saturated fat.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV