INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Date:
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:59:32 +0200
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<018301c4552d$e4e4ddb0$940310ac@deneb>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
2004-06-18 kl. 14.15 skrev Wojciech Sieniawski:

> Es UMI non sufficiente por activitate international organisate de
> interlinguistas?
> Primo, il debe monstrar utilitate del interlingua in e por le Union
> europee,
> que non es si facile. Io volerea cognoscer le plan del UMI que
> contenirea
> tal activitates, propagante idea del interlingua como un lingua utile
> por
> UE, ante demandar moneta al
> commission in Brussela.
> Wojtek

Tu attitude es bon. Es melior que on primo face qualcosa pro demonstrar
que on ha possibilitates, e postea le Commission pote interessar se.

Ego pensa que le UMI es sufficente, ma in un futuro un union
interlingua pro le EU pote esser un bon idea.

Kjell R

ATOM RSS1 RSS2