PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: for chocaholics
From:
Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 03:12:46 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
--- Adrienne Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> This is less sugar
> than most fruits, plus the
> chocolate also contains some fat and protein.

Yes, except that the sugar is probably sucrose, versus
the mostly fructose in fruits, and sucrose has a much
higher glycemic index than fructose.


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2