I've not yet read any later posts in my inbox today, but my guess is she's
probably embarrassed by both parents' behavior.  Fortunately, albeit oddly,
the media seem to have left her to her own thoughts.  I'm certain she's
grateful for that.

Kyle

-----Original Message-----
From: K. Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Come up here and sit on Auntie Rodham-Clinton's Lap. (was
Irony. ..guess it still is <g>)


I just had a funny thought - I suppose we'll find out what Chelsea thinks of
her parents when *she* writes her own tell-all book!

After all, both mum and dad are doing it, why not she? ;-)
Kat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cleveland, Kyle E." <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Come up here and sit on Auntie Rodham-Clinton's Lap. (was Irony.
..guess it still is <g>)


> As regards Chelsea, it's my understanding that her parents--both of
> them--were more involved with their political machinations than spending
> time raising their daughter.  Sure, it takes a village to raise your kids
> when your out politicking and making nefarious land deals.  I think the
kid
> probably turned out ok in spite of her parents, not because of any special
> nurturing they gave.  Sometimes it just happens that way.  Sometimes the
> "preacher's kids" turn out to be the delinquents.
>