Do you really want to blame the victim?
Would it have been okay if everyone had survived?
-jc
On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 07:57 AM, Met History wrote:
> In a message dated 5/8/03 8:53:09 AM, [log in to unmask]
> writes:
>
> can't find the weapons of mass destruction
>
>
>
> How about inadequate fireproofing of WTC? That was pretty mass.
>
> Sign me, Still Think The "Presumptious" Question Of What Would Have
> Happened to the Empire State Building Is Relevant, and That The
> Defense That The WTC "Performed Remarkably Well" Is Spurious