BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: morse code
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 May 2004 14:00:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
Actually, these days the written is not bad, in fact, I think it's easier
then 9.5 years ago when I got my tech, I think it's much easier now.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scottv" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: morse code


> i bet the written is really not easy though.smile.
> I'm going for my general next.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 8:17 PM
> Subject: Re: morse code
>
>
> > Extras are in on the 5wpm code test.  Having earned my extra last fall I
> am
> > personally familiar with that part of it <g>.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2