BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:20:16 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Message-Id: <20031022122128.BPEJ1847.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.212.107.115]>

MIke Freeman wrote,
   >When this discussion came up a few years ago, I, as VP of the NFB
   >Hamn Radio Group, made some inquiries, both on behalf of myself and
   >on behalf of the NFB Ham Group.
   >At that time, ARRL's position was that it could not compel a VEC to
   >use blind VE's.  However, it's position was that if a VEC or its
   >affiliates was willing to use blind VE's, ARRL had no objections.
   >We may want to check this one out officially.
True.  I don't think they expressed any reservations when I got my
badge, and I'm fairly certain that the topic if blindness did come up.

Your discussion a few years ago was one reason I was willing to go for
it Mike.  I know for a fact that Fred Maya has a different position on
this issue, and I have no interest in becoming certified with w5yi
anyway.

73 de nf5b



Richard Webb

Electric Spider Productions
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

--- Benjamin Franklin, NOvember 1755 from the
Historical review of Pennsylvania




ATOM RSS1 RSS2