BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rich De Steno <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:26:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Butch:

Can you please send me that comparison article?  Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Accessible Dual-Band HT's


> I have both the icom t-90 and kenwood th-f6.  I wrote a comparison file a
> while back and can repost if interested.  I actually prefer the Kenwood as
> I think it is a little more accessable, although some on here like the
> t-90.  Depends on what you're looking for.  220 versis 6 meters,
> sensativity on tv channels and so forth.  my biggest gripe on the icom is
> that darn key pad.  Wish they'd have kept it standard.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2