I find this kind of harsh, but will agree to disagree.  I've found that she
generates two extreme reactions. almost never in the middle.

Kat

----  Original Message -----
From: "Cleveland, Kyle E." <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Come up here and sit on Auntie Rodham-Clinton's Lap. (was Irony.
..guess it still is <g>)


> HRC is not "evil"?  Maybe not.  Let's go ask her buddy Vince Foster....
>
> What?  You say he was found in a DC park with a "self inflicted" gunshot
> wound to the back of the head?  Limber fellow, that one!
>
> Drollness, drollity, drollision, drollosity aside, if you have children,
> read "It Takes a Village".  Stephen King's got nothing on her!  Even more
> frightening is that while Mr. King's works are novels, Miz R-C's is dead
> serious, "this is the way things would be if I had my way" non-fiction.
>
> As regards Chelsea, it's my understanding that her parents--both of
> them--were more involved with their political machinations than spending
> time raising their daughter.  Sure, it takes a village to raise your kids
> when your out politicking and making nefarious land deals.  I think the
kid
> probably turned out ok in spite of her parents, not because of any special
> nurturing they gave.  Sometimes it just happens that way.  Sometimes the
> "preacher's kids" turn out to be the delinquents.
>
> Point is, as Bobby indicated, HRC would just as soon have the government
> raise your children and turn them into a wonderful race of
> politically-correct Utopians.  Am I being tongue-in-cheek?  A little,
maybe,
> but what Hillary has publicly proposed is not too far from Marxist ideals,
> or, worse yet, Hitler's concepts.
>
> Yep, she's a person I fear.  I'd be afraid of her if she were male too.
>
> Kyle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BG Greer, PhD [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Ironies
>
>
> Scott,
>
>        You are correct about President Bush's administration and
> constitutional rights.
> I can not agree with you about Senator Clinton. She has an agenda and in
its
> own way it will restrict the rights of parents to discipline their
children
> and other "big government" tactics. I sound like a far right wing nut, but
> having lived in Memphis which is next to Arkansas, we heard more about
Mrs.
> C then
> most folks.
>
> Bobby
>
>
> > What George W. Bush has done to the office of President and to the
> > Constitution of this country (particularly to the doctrine of habeus
> corpus)
> > is far more troubling to me.
> >
> >