BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
shawn klein <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:43:07 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<008701c3ec30$eaa568c0$0201a8c0@xtra>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (100 lines)
My thinking exactly.
--- Scott Gillen N0HOK <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I also appreciate the talk on Jaws and WindowEyes as
> I will be getting one
> soon and at least on this list you can hear both
> sides.  But does any have
> subscription info for a Jaws e-mail list and a
> WindowEyes list?
>
> Thanks
>
> 73
>
> Scott
> N0HOK / ZL1CHM
> Auckland New Zealand
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:55 AM
> Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
>
>
> >     Folks:
> >
> > I agree with Terri here.
> >
> > I know this isn't a computer users' list-serve,
> but it is a blindhams list
> > serve, and since we all use computers for ham
> radio and other
> applications,
> > the topic seems relevant to me.
> >
> > Personally, I really appreciate the dialogue, and,
> as someone earlier
> said,
> > if something isn't of interest, just hit the good
> old delete button.
> >
> > I myself am going to be switching to Windows XP
> and Jaws 5.0 both at work
> > and at home this summer, and really appreciate
> knowing that a bunch of
> > down-to-earth people are available on this list to
> help with those
> questions
> > that crop up from time to time.
> >
> > So, in my oppinion, thanks, guys!
> >
> > Best 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Terri Pannett" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
> >
> >
> > > I think the thread is interesting.  Have you
> noticed there are more
> > > questions about how to get JAWS to do this or
> that than WindowEyes?  It
> > > implies WE either does the job better or is
> easier to learn how to use.
> > >
> > > You can always relate screen readers to ham
> radio if you want to use
> them
> > > for reading Packet or Pactor or how about
> comparing screen readers when
> > you
> > > want to program a radio using your PC.
> > >
> > > Terri, Amateur radio call sign KF6CA.  Army MARS
> call sign AAT9PX,
> > > California
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:09 PM
> > > Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
> > >
> > >
> > > > Not much I admit but their are really
> thoughtful and smart people up
> > here.
> > > > Besides, does every qso have to only discuss
> rig antenna and RST?
> > > >
> >
> >


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2